Tuesday, November 05, 2013

The Stanford Startup and the MIT Startup

Message from a Jedi to a Young Padawan
When I graduated and was considering pursuing startups, an alum from my fraternity gave me some advice. He was a successful entrepreneur and sent me a message about pursuing technology-oriented startups. He presented a maxim about an MIT company and a Stanford company building products for the same market. The Stanford company gets a product out quickly, they make money, iterate and then raise money. They use network effects to lock-in customers or viral growth tactics to get super-linear returns on marketing investment. The MIT company seeks to develop an unassailable technical advantage, optimizing their product or process in terms of kilojoules, units per second, and dollars. They either find a market-fit or sell their technology to the Stanford company.

The dichotomy is between a focus on technology development and a focus on market development.

Let me present an instance of this: two startups are selling environmentally-friendly ammonia (a real and big problem).

The Pitch
The MIT company: "Our unique chemical process allows us to produce ammonia with no environmental impact for 10 percent less cost than competitors. We can modify our catalytic nanoparticle process for the production of perchlorates and sulfates, and dominate the industrial chemical supply industry."

The Stanford company: "We sell premium household cleaning supplies and fertilizer that are produced sustainably and good for the environment. We sell in stores and offer a monthly subscription model; receiving a package will remind you to clean up your house and water your flowers."

Sales and Marketing
The MIT startup has no sales to customers, but possibly a DARPA grant to develop their technology. The team has 9 PhDs and just hired an MBA to start finding customers. They believe their technical advantage using solar-powered nano-crystalline catalysts will enable them to lower the cost of production of commodity chemicals and therefore dominate the market. Their customers will be the major fertilizer, pharmaceutical and consumer product companies. Google for the company name and you will find a landing page. They are still "in stealth mode" while they finish up some R&D and production optimizations for their nano-particle production. Team MIT needs funding to develop a manufacturing facility (and to survive as a company). Their vision for sales and distribution involves hundreds of payments for tens of millions of dollars each year for shipment sizes that look like something out of The Wire or Breaking Bad.

The Stanford startup has developed no new technology but has already validated its customer model selling sustainable branded cleaners and fertilizers at a local Whole Foods and Home Depot. Costs for sustainably produced chemicals are higher, but the founders maxed out their credit card buying a wholesale shipment and were able to sell a premium retail product at a small profit. They setup stands at farmers' markets to sign people up for monthly packages of cleaning supplies and plant food. After testing their market hypothesis, they decided to focus on cleaning products and limit marketing for the fertilizer product because that strategy generated more recurring revenue for less cost. Attrition rate for the cleaning product shipments is lower than growth and there are customers posting on the internet about how much they "appreciate the hand-signed note thanking them for supporting their mission to spread sustainable production." They have thousands of monthly customers, they know their cost per customer acquisition and they know their average revenue per customer. Team Stanford think they could get millions of customers to pay them $9 a month for their product; which includes rags in addition to ammonia and bleach. They are still tracking a growing market niche for sustainable home food growing systems including plant food and seeds. They think viral marketing strategies will help them reduce their customer acquisition costs so they want funding to expand logistics and distribution in other regions and try some other growth strategies like advertisements, and letting people choose scents in-stores before placing an order.

Investor Response
The outcome for either of these companies is non-obvious. The MIT company claims to have the successor to the Haber-Bosch process, a chemical process technology that won its inventors Nobel prizes and was the foundation for what was once the world's largest chemical supplier. However, they want to enter an established commodity market and need to prove that they can scale sales from zero. Investors will need to vet the technology before they can fund the company. Investors look for "order of magnitude better" when vetting technology companies to determine if the technology is defensible. Very few investors will have an understanding of the chemical supply market and fewer still will understand the founders' PhD work optimizing production of ammonia using nano-particle colloids. They will also need a lot of funding before they can serve this market.

On the other hand, the Stanford startup has traction in a market and will likely have a much easier time raising funding. Investors will understand their consumer market and they won't require technical vetting. It is unclear if their market position is defensible.  Someone else can replicate what they do especially since there are no network effects where the total value of the product increases with more users thus creating market lock-in. However, they don't need much funding to grow their sales and they are looking to scale from a solid profitable foundation, which decreases the perceived risk to investors.

The MIT startup could potentially be a $100B company in the chemical supply market. However, the Stanford startup can be reasonably valued at $10M today based on traction and will get term sheets from many investors. The MIT startup is much more speculative today and needs to find a wealthy individual to bankroll their first factory or take strategic investment from large potential customers.

Conclusions
There are many companies that fit both of these patterns and end up successful. The successful technology startups eventually develop a market approach. A lot of founders pivot from developing hi-tech to do entirely different market-focused ventures. Some founders have taken both approaches in separate companies and been successful at both. Conventional wisdom suggests the best startups develop technology and a market simultaneously. Many startups can operate with just a telephone and a spreadsheet on day one and then use technology to automate their operations. Technology is not a prerequisite for business success, but marketing is.

21 comments:

John Melonakos said...

Great post and congrats on getting noticed by Hacker News for this one. I have a blog about accelerated computing too (http://notonlyluck.com) and you might be interested in following ArrayFire :)

Good to be connected to you :)

Anonymous said...

A really great post. thank you.

Anonymous said...

Lame, idiotic stereotypes

Anonymous said...

It's a bit of a ridiculous dichotomy, but I see your point. I like your post but would've liked it far better if it wasn't so superficial - as an MIT grad I would have expected some numbers and not just unproven claims.

Moreover, calling yourself a "jedi" on the basis of founding one company that didn't raise seed is a bit of a stress.

Anonymous said...

The MIT / Stanford dichotomy is interesting. Beyond that, an important point is that those heavy tech companies should invest earlier and heavier in market development. This investment will pay dividends in market acceptance and fund raising. And, they need to pay attention to the business model. Innovation in the business model, especially in the commodity space, is critical for new entrant. -Andrew

Unknown said...

this hilarious youtube starring Nicola Tesla, pretty much sums up the state of affairs in Silicon Valley.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zngK13FMgXM

John said...

I cannot attest to the MIT vs Stanford aspect (and it would be good to see some date to test this hypothesis), but we have observed this in the start-ups we try to move out of academic labs and incubators.

The start-ups out of the lab are tech-heavy, can be hard to pitch but probably offer higher chance to make a fundamental change in a market - and a bigger impact.

The accelerator-based, usually business model focused start-up, is easier to grasp, cheaper to fund and faster to market (or fail).

For most investors the choice is simple - go the faster route.

It also drives home the point that if you go have a heavily tech-based start-up, you need to find investors who know your space, have invested in it and understand the time and steps necessary to grow the business. You cannot convert investors over to your space.

admin said...

nice, thank you . .

myegyware said...

a great hard work god bless you man

gwencon said...

Good read! Oh, btw, for entrepreneurs who have great startup ideas but lacks funding, I suggest visiting iSeed.. It's an angel group who focuses to very early stage startup.

Franco said...

Your last sentence was a great summary for what I needed to take away from your article. The two different approaches to market just happened to use two schools as examples ... that could have been replaced with GM and Ford, Oracle and IBM...Great read!

Unknown said...

It’s my fortune to go to at this blog and realize out my required stuff that is also in the quality.cloud4computers

Anonymous said...

Awesome work! That is quite appreciated. I hope you’ll get more success.Mr. Hugh

Anonymous said...

I think FPGA is definitely the way to go but the competition there is pretty high so don't know about a startup there. Been reading The Design Warrior's Guide to FPGAs and FPGA is pretty good technology

Lea Paige Matteo said...

How Lemeridian funding service  grant me a loan!!!

Hello everyone, I'm Lea Paige Matteo from Zurich Switzerland and want to use this medium to express gratitude to lemeridian funding service for fulfilling his promise by granting me a loan, I was stuck in a financial situation and needed to refinance and pay my bills as well as start up a Business. I tried seeking for loans from various loan firms both private and corporate organisations but never succeeded and most banks declined my credit request. But as God would have it, I was introduced by a friend named Lisa Rice to Le_meridian funding service and undergone the due process of obtaining a loan from the company, to my greatest surprise within 48hrs just like my friend Lisa, I was also granted a loan of $216,000.00 So my advise to everyone who desires a loan, "if you must contact any firm with reference to securing a loan online with low interest rate of 1.9% and better repayment plans/schedule, please contact Le_meridian funding service. Besides, he doesn't know that am doing this but due to the joy in me, I'm so happy and wish to let people know more about this great company whom truly give out loans, it is my prayer that GOD should bless them more as they put smiles on peoples faces. You can contact them via email on {lfdsloans@lemeridianfds.com Or lfdsloans@outlook.com} or Text through Whatsapp +1-989 394 3740.

Richard William said...

I am very grateful to Elegant loan firm for helping me get a $ 600,000 loan with the helping of loan officer Russ Harry, and I will always be grateful. My life has changed, my money has been paid, I now own a business that I used to support my family. I am grateful to you, Mr. Russ, and God bless you. You can contact them for your financial assistance by e-mail: Elegantloanfirm@hotmail.com for your financial assistance.

Paul Delphine said...

Hello everyone, I'm Patricia Sherman in Oklahoma USA right now. I would like to share with you my experience of borrowing USD $185,000.00 to clear my bank draft and start a new business. It all started when I lost my house and I took my stuff because of the bank policy and I met some bills and some personal needs. So I became very desperate and started looking for funds in every way. Fortunately for me, a friend of mine, Linda told me about a credit company firm, I was intrigued by the fraud, but I was intrigued by my situation and had no choice but to get advice from my friend about this company. contacting them really doubted me because of my past experience with online lenders, did you know that little? '' Elegantloanfirm@hotmail.com This company has been very helpful to me and my colleague and today, thanks to this credit company, the proud owner of well-organized work and responsibilities, they smiled back at me. So if you really need to grow or start your own business, or if you really need to borrow money in any financial hardship, we recommend you find a financial development opportunity in your business today. {E-mail:} Elegantloanfirm@hotmail.com / whats-app number +393511617486.... online for credit not a victim of scam Thank you.

KITS Technologies said...

Thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again. Fantastic.
Cognos training
Core Java online training
Core Java training
Django online training
Django training
Go Language online training
Go Language training
Hibernate online training
Hibernate training
Hyperion ESS Base online training

Rebecca Michaelson said...

HELLO, I am Rebecca Michaelson by name living in Europe. Here is a good news for those interested. There is away you can earn money without stress contact (THOMAS FREDDIE) for a blank [ATM CARD] today and be among the lucky once who are benefiting from this cards. This PROGRAMMED blank ATM card is capable of hacking into any ATM machine anywhere in the world. I got my master card from a good Hacker on the internet, with this ATM Card I am able to collect $5000 dollars every day via contacts:
+1 (985)-465-8370 {thomasunlimitedhackers@gmail.com}
I was very poor but this card have made me rich and happy, If you want to get this opportunity to become rich and establish your business then apply for this Master card, I am so happy about this because i got mine last week and I have used it to get $240,000.00 dollars from THOMAS FREDDIE UNLIMITED Hackers is giving out the card just to help the poor and needy and they ALSO OFFER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE. get yours from THOMAS FREDDIE UNLIMITED HACKERS today. Kindly contact them by Email thomasunlimitedhackers@gmail.com

Thank You and God bless

BUSINESS FARM OWNER MR.Justin Riley Johnson said...

HOW I GOT MY DESIRED LOAN AMOUNT FROM A RELIABLE AND TRUSTED LOAN COMPANY LAST WEEK Email for immediate response: drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com Call/Text: +1(646)820-1981 Whatsapp +19292227023 Visit their website and believe yourself Company Website: https://capitalmanage-inc.com/

Hello everyone, My name is Mr.Justin Riley Johnson, I'm from Texas, United State, I'm here to testify of how i got my loan from CAPITAL MANAGEMENTS INC (drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com) after i applied Two times from various loan lenders who claimed to be lenders right here this forum,i thought their lending where real and i applied but they never gave me loan until a friend of mine introduce me to {Dr.Benjamin Scarlet Owen} the C.E.O of CAPITAL MANAGEMENTS INC who promised to help me with a loan of my desire and he really did as he promised without any form of delay, I never thought there are still reliable loan lenders until i met {Dr.Benjamin Scarlet Owen}, who really helped me with my loan and changed my life for the better. I don't know if you are in need of an urgent loan also, So feel free to contact Dr.Benjamin Scarlet Owen on his email address: drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com CAPITAL MANAGEMENTS INC holds all of the information about how to obtain money quickly and
painlessly via Whatsapp +19292227023 Email: drbenjaminfinance@gmail.com

And consider all your financial problems tackled and solved. Share this to help a soul right now, Thanks
Visit their website and believe yourself Company Website:https://capitalmanage-inc.com/

awning in pune said...

awning in pune
Iris Enterprises awning in pune
awning in pune Iris Enterprises
awning manufacturer in pune Iris Enterprises
awning dealers in pune